METHODS OF TEACHING TEXTILE TERMINOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The teaching of textile terminology in higher education institutions is a critical aspect of specialized education within the field of textile science and technology. Given the complexity and specificity of textile terminology, educators must employ various pedagogical methods to ensure that students not only acquire an extensive vocabulary but also understand its practical application. This article explores the key methods used to teach textile terminology, examining their effectiveness and providing recommendations for improving the learning process.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Djanibekov, U., van Assche, K., Boezeman, D. and Djanibekov, N. (2013). Understanding contracts in evolving agro-economies: Fermers, dekhqans and networks in Khoresm, Uzbekistan. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 137-147.
Dries, L. and Swinnen, J. (2004). Foreign direct investment, vertical integration, and local suppliers: evidence from the Polish dairy sector. World Development, 32(9), 1525–1544.
Glover, D. and Kusterer, K. (1990). Small Farmers, Big Business: Contract Farming and Rural
Development. London: Macmillan.
Gow, H. and Swinnen, J. (2001). Private enforcement capital and contract enforcement in
transition countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 686–690.
Key, N. and Runsten, D. (1999). Contract farming, smallholders, and rural development in Latin America: the organization of agroprocessing firms and the scale of outgrower production. World Development, 27(2), 381–401.
Lerman, Z. (2010). Agricultural recovery and individual land tenure: Evidence from Central Asia. Imre Ferto, Csaba Forgacs, Attila Jambor (Eds.): Changing landscape of European agriculture. Essays in honour of professor Csaba Csaki. Budapest: Agroinform, pp. 95–113.
Little, P. and Watts, M. (1994). Living Under Contract: Contract Farming and Agrarian Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Mensch, G. (1979). Stalemate in Technology: Innovations overcome the Depression. Cambridge, Masachusetts, pp. 87–90.
Morrissy, J. D. (1974). Agricultural Modernization through Production Contracting. New York: Praeger.
Pandey, P. (2013). Triple Helix for Communication of Innovations: Case Study of Bt Cotton in India. Asian Biotechnology & Development Review, 15(1), 21-42.
Petrick, M. and Djanibekov, N. (2015). Institutional change in land and labour relations of Central Asia’s irrigated agriculture (AGRICHANGE). Project description. IAMO.
Petrick, M. and Djanibekov, N. (2016). Obstacles to crop diversification and cotton harvest mechanisation: Farm survey evidence from two contrasting districts in Uzbekistan: IAMO Discussion Papers 153. Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO).
Pomfret, R. (2008). Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, Ch 8. In Dostortions to Agricultural Incentives in Europe’s Transition Economies. K. Anderson and J. Swinnen (Eds.). World Bank, Washington, DC, pp. 297-338.