ASSESSMENT OF BONE TISSUE CONDITION DURING DENTAL IMPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH SOMATIC DISEASES

Authors

  • Kasimova Edie Vilulevna Assistant of the Department: Propaedeutics of Orthopedic Dentistry; Tashkent State Medical University; Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/

Keywords:

dental implant, somatic pathology, somatic diseases, osteopenia, osteoporosis. markers of osteogenesis, calcium-regulating hormones, densitometry.

Abstract

The issue of dental implantation in patients with chronic somatic diseases is becoming increasingly important in modern dental practice. The increase in life expectancy, the growing prevalence of endocrine, cardiovascular, and metabolic disorders, as well as age-related changes in bone tissue, necessitate a more thorough preparation of patients for implant treatment. Particular attention is paid to the condition of bone metabolism, since disturbances in bone remodeling processes may affect implant osseointegration and the course of the postoperative period. In this regard, the study of indicators characterizing bone tissue condition, as well as factors contributing to the development of complications during dental implantation, remains highly relevant. A comprehensive assessment of the structural and functional characteristics of bone tissue makes it possible to determine preventive strategies and optimize the management of patients with concomitant somatic pathology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Anichkov N.M., Kvetnoy I.M. Bone tissue metabolism and its clinical significance. Klinicheskaya meditsina. 2019;97(5):12–18. (In Russian).

2.Grudyanov A.I., Frolova O.A. Modern concepts of the relationship between somatic pathology and periodontal diseases. Stomatologiya. 2021;100(4):15–21. (In Russian).

3.Ermak E.Yu., Borisova E.G. Features of osseointegration of dental implants in patients with osteopenia. Rossiyskiy stomatologicheskiy zhurnal. 2020;24(3):28–33. (In Russian).

4.Ivashchenko V.A., Melnichenko G.A. Osteoporosis and disorders of calcium-phosphorus metabolism in clinical practice. Terapevticheskiy arkhiv. 2022;94(8):45–52. (In Russian).

5.Kasimova E.V., Salimov O.R., Ochilova M.U., Tolipova M.A. Relationship between estrogen deficiency and periodontal diseases in postmenopausal women. Journal of New Century Innovations. 2022;18(3):49–71.

6.Losev F.F., Zoryan E.V. Bone tissue condition in patients with endocrine pathology during dental implant planning. Institut stomatologii. 2021;(2):58–62. (In Russian).

7.Mazur I.P., Povoroznyuk V.V. Bone system and periodontal diseases. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2002;(2):27–32. (In Russian).

8.Mirgazizov M.Z., Yanushevich O.O. Assessment of risk factors during dental implantation in patients with somatic diseases. Stomatologiya. 2020;99(6):34–39. (In Russian).

9.Ostrovskiy A.B., Lukinykh L.M. Biochemical markers of bone remodeling and their significance in dentistry. Parodontologiya. 2021;26(1):42–48. (In Russian).

10.Robakidze N.S., Aliev R.D. Influence of diabetes mellitus on osseointegration processes during dental implantation. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2022;(1):37–41. (In Russian).

11.Yarmukhamedov B., Amanullaev R., Gazieva E., Rakhmatov A., Makhmudov M. Morphological criteria of possible risk of dental implantation in patients with periodontal diseases associated with somatic pathology. Stomatologiya. 2020;(2):48–51.

12.Yarmukhamedov B., Amanullaev R., Gazieva E., Turgunov A., Melikuziev T. Features of bone tissue condition during dental implantation in patients with somatic diseases. Stomatologiya. 2020;(3):29–32.

13.Hammouri M.H., Salekh K.M. Dental implants osseointegration in patients with osteoporosis. RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2022;26(4):422–430. doi:10.22363/2313-0245-2022-26-4-422-430.

14.Joob F.A., Kerekes E., Koppany F. Changes in the indications for oral surgical implants based on statistical analysis. Fogorvosi Szemle. 2007;100(3):103–107.

15.Liapaki A., Chen Y., Hadad H., Guastaldi F.P.S., August M. Evaluation of oral implant survival rate in postmenopausal women with osteopenia/osteoporosis: a retrospective pilot study. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2022;123(6)–e781. doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2022.06.023.

16.Lv X., Zou L., Zhang X., et al. Effects of diabetes/hyperglycemia on peri-implant biomarkers and clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with dental implant restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2022;33(12):1183–1198. doi:10.1111/clr.14010.

17.Vilulevna K.E. A comprehensive approach to fixed prosthodontic treatment in postmenopausal women. Universal Insights Conference on Science and Society. 2026;4(1):164–167.

18.Zhang C., Zhang T., Geng T., Wang X., Lin K., Wang P. Dental implants loaded with bioactive agents promote osseointegration in osteoporosis: a review. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2021;9:591796. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.591796.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20

How to Cite

ASSESSMENT OF BONE TISSUE CONDITION DURING DENTAL IMPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH SOMATIC DISEASES. (2026). International Bulletin of Medical Sciences and Clinical Research, 6(5), 78-84. https://doi.org/10.37547/

Similar Articles

11-20 of 248

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.