RE-CUTTING BENCHES IN A BLAST-BULLDOZER-BASEMENT COMPLEX DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF “MOUNTAIN-DEPOSIT” TYPE DEPOSITS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article discusses and presents a methodology for cutting benches in a blast-bulldozer-basement system for mining “mountain-deposit” mineral deposits. Experimental studies have demonstrated the feasibility of reducing the volume of rock bypassed by bulldozers in a blast-bulldozer-basement system by enhancing the blast's throwing effect on the discharge. In most cases, when the slope angle is less than or equal to the working wall angle (φ≤γ), steep-slice mining can begin from the bottom up the slope. This increases the quarry wall height with the cutting of new benches until the wall reaches the mountain crest. Subsequently, the wall height will remain constant for a long time (when mining a mountain ridge or plateau) or begin to decrease (when mining a dome-shaped hill). The high efficiency of the blast-dozer-basement system using flat, stepped charges makes it suitable for construction material quarries. This system is particularly effective in newly developed deposits. Switching to this technology at existing quarries using a different system requires minor modifications, such as re-cutting the benches.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1.Ilyin S.A. Technology of open-pit mining of upland deposits. Part IV. Study guide. Moscow: MGI, 1994. - 67 p.
2. islibaev I.T., Samadova G.M. Study of the Formation and Spallation of a Stepped Quarry Wall during the Staged Development of Upland Deposits // International Journal of Advanced Technology and Natural Sciences. -2022. No. 3(2). –P. 4-10.
3.Samadova, G.M., & Tuychieva, D.I. Technological Features of Cascade Development of Upland Deposits. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Natural Sciences, 2022. 3(3), 10-15.
4.Yastrebinsky M.A. Design Manual (Economic Calculations) - Moscow: MGI. -2009. -93 p.
5.Yastrebinsky M.A. Design Guidelines (Economic Part) Moscow: MGI. -2003. -109 p.
6.Nehring M., Knights P F., Kizil M. S., Hay E. A comparison of strategic mine planning approaches for in-pit crushing and conveying, and truck/shovel systems // International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. - 2018. Vol. 28. Iss. 2.- P 205-214.
7.Whittle D, Brazil M., Grossman P A., Rubinstein J. H., Thomas D. A. Combined optimisation of an open-pit mine outline and the transition depth to underground mining // European Journal of Operational Research. - 2018. Vol. 268. Iss. 2. - P 624-634.