SIMILARITIES IN CONTENT BETWEEN THE WORKS OF RABINDRANATH TAGORE AND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/Keywords:
Content similarity, literary parallelism, oriental literature, national spirit, humanistic ideas, philosophical depth, literary analysis, self-awareness, literary dialogue.Abstract
This article analyzes the content similarities in the works of Indian writer Rabindranath Tagore and Uzbek writer Shukur Kholmirzayev. It studies how themes such as humanity, moral values, social inequality, and the harmony of nature and spirit are reflected in the works of writers. This study, written on the basis of the IMRAD model, highlights the common ideological directions of representatives of two different literary schools.
Downloads
References
1. Tagore, Rabindranath. Gitanjali. Tashkent: Gafur Ghulom Publishing House of Literature and Art, 1985. (Translator: Khurshid Davron)
2. Dutta, Krishna; Robinson, Andrew. Rabindranath Tagore: The Myriad-Minded Man. London: Bloomsbury, 1995.
3. Radice, William. Selected Poems of Rabindranath Tagore. London: Penguin Books, 1985.
4. Sen, Amartya. The Argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian Culture, History and Identity. London: Penguin Books, 2005. (There is a chapter on Tagore's philosophy)
5. Thompson, Edward. Rabindranath Tagore: His Life and Work. Calcutta: The Association Press, 1921.
6. Matyokubov, Toshpolat. “The Great Child of the East: Rabindranath Tagore.” // Sharq yulduzi, 1991, No. 3. – P. 113–117.
7. Kholmirzayev, Shukur. “Rabindranath Tagore – A Bridge Connecting the West and the East.” // Yosh kuch, 1975, No. 6. – P. 21–24.
Karimov, Komiljon. “Ideas of National Revival in Tagore's Work.” // Language and Literature Education, 2022, No. 1. – P. 42–47.
8. Hasanov, Bakhtiyor. Oriental Literature and Tagore's Poetics. Tashkent: Science, 1999.
9. Kuchkarov, Tohir. The Poetics of Shukur Kholmirzayev's Storytelling. Tashkent: Science, 2009.
10. Gafurova, Nargiza. “The Motive of Spiritual Suffering in Shukur Kholmirzayev's Stories.” // Uzbek Language and Literature, 2021, No. 4. – P. 58–61
