Explainability-Centered Machine Learning for Reliable Solid-State Drive Failure Prediction

Authors

  • Siti Nur Aisyah Department of Computer Science, Bandung Institute of Computing, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ibast/Volume06Issue09-01

Keywords:

Solid-State Drive, SSD Failure Prediction, Explainable Artificial Intelligence, LIME

Abstract

Solid-state drives (SSDs) are increasingly deployed in computing infrastructures where storage reliability directly influences service continuity, data availability, and maintenance cost. Predicting SSD failure before catastrophic degradation therefore requires machine-learning models capable of identifying complex patterns in operational data while providing explanations that can be trusted by engineers and system administrators. This research develops an explainability-centered conceptual framework for reliable SSD failure prediction by integrating predictive machine learning with local and global interpretability mechanisms, particularly Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) and Shapley-based explanations (SHAP). The methodological foundation is informed by the supplied literature on optimization, intelligent scheduling, knowledge-driven algorithms, reinforcement learning, and simulation–optimization. These studies demonstrate the importance of combining data-driven learning with domain knowledge, optimization objectives, dynamic decision mechanisms, and interpretable operational factors. The proposed framework organizes SSD telemetry into health indicators, constructs a failure-risk model, generates global and instance-level explanations, and incorporates explanation consistency into reliability assessment. Rather than reporting fabricated experimental measurements, the study presents analytical findings concerning the expected behavior, advantages, limitations, and deployment implications of an explainability-centered architecture. The framework emphasizes that high predictive accuracy alone is insufficient for safety-critical storage management; a reliable prediction should also identify the operational evidence responsible for its decision. The resulting architecture provides a structured basis for transparent preventive maintenance, risk prioritization, and human-centered SSD reliability management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. ( Airbus, Blagnac, France ). 2024 Global Market Forecast. 2024, Accessed: Mar. 4, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.airbus.com/en/products-services/commercial-aircraft/global-market-forecast

2. B. J. V. Da Silva, R. Morabito, D. S. Yamashita, and H. H. Yanasse, “Production scheduling of assembly fixtures in the aeronautical industry,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 67, pp. 195–203, Jan. 2014.

3. S. Chen, X. Wang, Y. Wang, and X. Gu, “A knowledge-driven many-objective algorithm for energy-efficient distributed heterogeneous hybrid flowshop scheduling with lot-streaming,” Swarm Evol. Comput., vol. 91, Dec. 2024, Art. no. 101771.

4. F. M. Defersha and S. B. Movahed, “Linear programming assisted (not embedded) genetic algorithm for flexible jobshop scheduling with lot streaming,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 117, pp. 319–335, Mar. 2018.

5. M. R. Garey, D. S. Johnson, and R. Sethi, “The complexity of flowshop and jobshop scheduling,” Math. Oper. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 117–129, May 1976.

6. J. He and J. Li, “Deep reinforcement learning based on graph neural network for flexible job shop scheduling problem with lot streaming,” in Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Adv. Intell. Comput. Technol. Appl., 2024, pp. 85–95.

7. J.-q. Li, “Efficient multi-objective algorithm for the lot-streaming hybrid flowshop with variable sub-lots,” Swarm Evol. Comput., vol. 52, Feb. 2020, Art. no. 100600.

8. L. Li, “Research on discrete intelligent workshop lot-streaming scheduling with variable sublots under engineer to order,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 165, Mar. 2022, Art. no. 107928.

9. R. Li, L. Wang, W. Gong, and F. Ming, “An evolutionary multitasking memetic algorithm for multi-objective distributed heterogeneous welding flow shop scheduling,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., early access, Apr. 25, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2024.3393620.

10. B. Lu, K. Gao, Y. Ren, D. Li, and A. Slowik, “Combining meta-heuristics and Q-learning for scheduling lot-streaming hybrid flow shops with consistent sublots,” Swarm Evol. Comput., vol. 91, Dec. 2024, Art. no. 101731.

11. A. Bożek and F. Werner, “Flexible job shop scheduling with lot streaming and sublot size optimisation,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 56, no. 19, pp. 6391–6411, Oct. 2018.

12. W. Shao, Z. Shao, and D. Pi, “Modelling and optimization of distributed heterogeneous hybrid flow shop lot-streaming scheduling problem,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 214, Mar. 2023, Art. no. 119151.

13. H. Tang, J. Huang, C. Ren, Y. Shao, and J. Lu, “Integrated scheduling of multi-objective lot-streaming hybrid flowshop with AGV based on deep reinforcement learning,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1275–1303, 2024.

14. G. Tian, W. Wang, H. Zhang, X. Zhou, C. Zhang, and Z. Li, “Multi-objective optimization of energy-efficient remanufacturing system scheduling problem with lot-streaming production mode,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 237, Mar. 2024, Art. no. 121309.

15. Z. Tian, X. Jiang, G. Tian, Z. Li, and W. Liu, “Knowledge-based lot-splitting optimization method for flexible job shops considering energy consumption,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 4864–4875, Jul. 2024.

16. H. Wang, T. Peng, X. Li, J. He, W. Liu, and R. Tang, “An integrated simulation–optimization method for flexible assembly job shop scheduling with lot streaming and finite transport resources,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 200, Feb. 2025, Art. no. 110790.

17. Y. Zhu, Q. Tang, L. Zhang, M. He, and J. Kapenda, “Improved multi-objective artificial bee colony algorithm for parallel machine lot-streaming scheduling problem with limited and unequal sub-lots,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 183, Sep. 2023, Art. no. 109428.

18. Kumar, S. K. (2026). Explainable AI for SSD Failure Prediction: Using LIME and SHAP for Transparency. Journal of Engineering Research and Sciences, 5(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.55708/js0504001

Downloads

Published

2026-09-07

How to Cite

Explainability-Centered Machine Learning for Reliable Solid-State Drive Failure Prediction. (2026). International Bulletin of Applied Science and Technology, 6(09), 01-12. https://doi.org/10.37547/ibast/Volume06Issue09-01

Similar Articles

61-70 of 2040

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.