THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL STYLE AND SOCIAL LANGUAGE UNITS IN LITERARY DISCOURSE

Authors

  • Nuraliyeva Shoxista Teacher of Foreign languages chair, FSU
  • Nurmatova Mubina Student of Fergana State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/

Keywords:

style; idiolect; sociolect; register; heteroglossia; dialogism; indexicality; stylistics; discourse; corpus

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between individual style and social language units in literary discourse, arguing that literary meaning is co-constructed at the intersection of idiolectal choices and socially shared linguistic configurations. The study synthesizes insights from stylistics, sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, and systemic-functional linguistics to frame “individual style” as a pattern of motivated selections and “social language units” as repertoires including register, sociolect, and genre-linked norms. Methodologically, it combines qualitative discourse analysis with corpus-informed profiling of narratorial and character speech, triangulating collocational tendencies, appraisal resources, transitivity patterns, and indexical cues across a purposive sample of contemporary Anglophone fiction. Results indicate that authors’ stylistic signatures are legible not apart from but through social language units they orchestrate: narrative voice calibrates registers for stance management; character idiolects weave sociolectal markers to perform identity; and style-shifting across scenes functions as a discourse-level resource for heteroglossia and plot dynamics. The discussion articulates implications for theory (style as social action), method (mixed-methods stylistics), and pedagogy (teaching style via register awareness), while acknowledging limits of genre scope and language coverage. The article contributes a model in which “individual style” is best understood as a selective reconfiguration of social language units, yielding an integrated account of variation, meaning, and effect in literary discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Simpson, Paul. Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. Routledge. 2014

2.Wales, Katie. A Dictionary of Stylistics. Routledge. 2011

3.Gee, James Paul. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. Routledge. 2014

4.Halliday, M. A. K.; Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Routledge. 2014

5.Fairclough, Norman. Language and Power. Routledge. 2014

6.van Dijk, Teun A. Discourse and Knowledge. Cambridge University Press. 2014

7.Johnstone, Barbara. Discourse Analysis. Wiley-Blackwell. 2018

8.Stockwell, Peter. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. Routledge. 2020

9.Bednarek, Monika. Language and Television Series: A Linguistic Approach to TV Dialogue. Cambridge University Press. 2018

10.Baker, Paul; McEnery, Tony. Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. Palgrave Macmillan. 2015

11.Tagliamonte, Sali A. Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge University Press. 2012

12.Mahlberg, Michaela. Corpus Stylistics and Dickens: Returns of the Repressed in Victorian Fiction. Bloomsbury. 2013

Downloads

Published

2026-07-25

How to Cite

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL STYLE AND SOCIAL LANGUAGE UNITS IN LITERARY DISCOURSE. (2026). International Bulletin of Applied Science and Technology, 6(7), 175-180. https://doi.org/10.37547/

Similar Articles

111-120 of 181

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.