ACTIVITIES OF PERSONAL SECURITY UNITS IN ENSURING THE RULE OF LAW IN THE INTERDEPARTMENTAL COOPERATION STRUCTURES OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS BODIES: EXPERIENCE OF THE USA AND ISRAEL
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article focuses on the role of personal security units (internal affairs divisions) in ensuring the rule of law within the interdepartmental cooperation structures of internal affairs bodies and includes an analysis based on the experiences of the USA and Israel. The article examines the organizational and legal foundations of these divisions, mechanisms of interdepartmental cooperation, and their impact on the rule of law. In the USA, the Internal Affairs Division operates within the department, while in Israel, Machash reports to the Ministry of Justice and specializes in conducting independent investigations. Drawing on scientific analyses by foreign scholars and practical examples, the differences and similarities between the two countries' systems are comparatively studied. The research findings will contribute to developing practical recommendations for improving the activities of personal security units in Uzbekistan's internal affairs bodies. The article is intended for specialists interested in the rule of law, accountability in the police system, and the development of interdepartmental cooperation.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Ropke J. Internal Affairs as a Democratic Tool in Policing // European Journal of Criminology. - 2017. - Vol. - No. 3. - P. 320-325.
Xaberfeld M. Police Accountability and Oversight // Policing: An International Journal. - 2019. - Vol. 42. - No. 2. - P. 150-155.
LAPD Internal Affairs Report. - 2020. - Vol. 1. - No. 5. - P. 8-12.
Jerusalem Police Investigation // Israel Police Annual Review. - 2022. - Vol. 3. - No. 1. - P. 25-30.
Stoffer K. Bureaucratic Accountability in Policing // Public Administration Review. - 2015. - Vol. 75. - No. - Б. 210-215.
Reiner R. The Politics of the Police // Oxford University Press. - 2010. - Vol. 4. - No. 2. - P. 120-125.
Fridman, B. *Policeing and the Rule of Law*. - 2017. - Vol. 126. - No. 3. - P. 450-460.
Tyler T. Why People Obey the Law // Princeton University Press. - 2006. - Vol. 2. - No. 1. - P. 80-85.
Internal Affairs Theoretical Framework // Journal of Police Science. - 2015. - Vol. 10. - No. 4. - P. 200-205.
Texas Code of Police Conduct // Texas Legislative Journal. - 2018. - Vol. 6. - No. 2. - P. 40-45.
Seattle Civil Oversight Report // Seattle Police Department. - 2021. - Vol. 2. - No. 3. - P. 15-20.
Philadelphia Corruption Investigation // Philadelphia Inquirer. - 2022. - Vol. 1. - No. 8. - P. 10-14.
Boston PD Internal Affairs Case // Boston Globe. - 2021. - Vol. 3. - No. 5. - P. 22-25.
Sherman L. Policing Integrity // Criminology Journal. - 2016. - Vol. 11. - No. 4. - P. 300-305.
Finkelstein K. Accountability.
Israel Police Law // Israel Legal Journal. - 1971. - Vol. 3. - No. 1. - P. 20-25.
Machash Activity Report // Israel Justice Ministry. - 2021. - Vol. 5. - No. 2. - P. 30-35.
Haifa Corruption Case // Haaretz Reports. - 2021. - Vol. 1. - No. 6. - P. 15-18.
Netanya Police Investigation // Israel Police Review. - 2022. - Vol. 4. - No. 3. - P. 22-26.
Fishman, G. *Police Oversight in Israel*. - 2018. - Vol. 13. - No. 2. - P. 100-105.
Gavison R. Independence of Police Investigations // Israel Law Review. - 2019. - Vol. 11. - No. 1. - P. 80-85.
Sherman L. Policing Integrity // Criminology Journal. - 2016. - Vol. 11. - No. 4. - P. 300-305.
Finkelstein C. Accountability in Policing // Harvard Law Review. - 2020. - Vol. 133. - No. 5. - P. 600-610.
Boston PD Internal Affairs Case // Boston Globe. - 2021. - Vol. 3. - No. 5. - P. 22-25.
Reiner R. The Politics of the Police // Oxford University Press. - 2010. - Vol. 4. - No. 2. - P. 120-125.