SPEECH ACTS, THEIR DIFFERENCES AND RELATIONS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article discusses John L. Austin's theory and classification of locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts. The illocutionary act, its theory, success, formulas and problems of classification are considered. The connection of the illocutionary act with other acts and the difference from them is considered, albeit partially.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Kent Bach. Robert. M. Harnish. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts – Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: The MIT Press
Searle, J. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Speech acts, An essay in, The philosophy of Language, John r. Searle, Austin 1975: 520
John L. Searle, (1975: 147).
Speech acts, An essay in, The philosophy of Language, John r. Searle, Austin 1975: 151
Speech acts, An essay in, The philosophy of Language, John r. Searle, Austin 1975: 163
Speech acts, An essay in, The philosophy of Language, John r. Searle, Austin 1975: 156-57
Speech acts, An essay in, The philosophy of Language, John r. Searle, Austin 1975: 164
Locution, illocution, perlocution Marina Sbisà published in: M. Sbisà & K. Turner (eds), Pragmatics of Speech Actions, Handbook of Pragmatics 2, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2013