AI-Based Automated Defect Detection and Test Prioritization in Software Quality Engineering

Authors

  • Azizbek Karimov Department of Artificial Intelligence, Institute of Digital Technologies, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Automated Defect Detection, Test Prioritization, Software Quality Engineering

Abstract

 

The increasing complexity of software systems has created a need for quality engineering approaches that can identify defects efficiently and allocate testing resources according to risk. AI-based automation offers a mechanism for transforming conventional test execution from a largely rule-driven process into an adaptive decision-making activity. This paper develops a conceptual framework for AI-based automated defect detection and test prioritization by synthesizing principles from the provided literature on graphical authentication, password usability, user behavior, and security-oriented evaluation. Although the cited studies primarily address authentication rather than software testing, they collectively demonstrate the importance of usability, behavioral variability, attack resistance, user choice, and systematic evaluation in automated security-sensitive systems. These principles are mapped to defect detection and test prioritization through a proposed pipeline consisting of test-data acquisition, defect-feature extraction, risk scoring, intelligent classification, prioritization, execution, and feedback-based model refinement. The analysis argues that AI-driven test automation can improve the allocation of testing effort by prioritizing cases associated with higher predicted defect probability or security impact. The framework also incorporates the broader perspective of AI-driven test automation frameworks for modern software quality engineering (Ramamurthy, 2023). The paper concludes that AI-based prioritization should not replace conventional testing controls; rather, it should function as an adaptive decision-support layer whose effectiveness depends on representative data, explainability, continuous validation, and careful management of false-positive and false-negative outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Assal, H., Imran, A., & Chiasson, S. (2018). An exploration ofgraphical password authentication for children.InternationalJournal of Child-Computer Interaction,18,37–46.

2. Azad, S., Rahman, M., Ranak, M. N., Ruhee, B. K., Nisa, N. N.,Kabir, N.,:::, & Zain, J. M. (2017). VAP code: A securegraphical password for smart devices. Computers &Electrical Engineering, 59, 99–109.

3. Biddle, R., Chiasson, S., & Van Oorschot, P. (2012). Graphicalpasswords: Learning from the first twelve years.Journal ofACM Computing Surveys (CSUR),44,19–41.

4. Brosto, S., & Sasse, M. A. (2000). Are Passfaces more usable thanpasswords? InA field trial investigation people and computersXIV–Usability or else!(pp. 405–424). Springer.

5. Danish, A., Sharma, L., Varshney, H., & Khan, A. M. (2016, March).Alignment-based graphical password authentication system. In2016 3rd International conference on computing for sustainableglobal development (INDIACom)(pp. 2950–2954). IEEE.

6. Davis, D., Monrose, F., & Reiter, M. (2004).On user choice ingraphical password schemes. InProceedings of the 13thUSENIX security symposium(pp. 151–164).

7. De-Angeli, A., Coventry, L., Johnson, G., & Renaud, K. (2005). Is apicture really worth a thousand words? Exploring thefeasibility of graphical authentication systems.InternationalJournal of Human-Computer Studies,63, 128–152.

8. Elftmann, P. (2006). Secure alternatives to password-basedauthentication mechanisms (Diploma Thesis, RWTH AachenUniversity, Aachen, Germany),https://www1.cs.fau.de/lepool/thesis/diplomarbeit-2006-elftmann.pdf. Accessed 20April 2017.

9. Gao, H., Ren, Z., Chang, X., Liu, X., & Aickelin, U. (2010). A newgraphical password scheme resistant to shoulder-surfing. InInternational conference on Cyberworlds (CW)(p. 194).

10. Gao, H. C., Wei, J., Ye, F., & Ma, L. C. (2013). A survey on the useof graphical passwords in security. Journal of Software, 8,1678–1698.http://www.jsoftware.us/vol8/jsw0807-16.pdf

11. Gayathiri, C. (2012). Text password survey: Transition fromfirst generation to second generation.http://blogs.ubc.ca/computersecurity/les/2012/04/Text-Password-SurveyGAYA.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2022.

12. Philip, P. G. (2025). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for Project Governance: Improving Transparency and Stakeholder Trust in Automated Project Decision. Journal of Project Management Studies, 2(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.58425/jpms.v2i1.570

13. Ramamurthy, K. (2023). AI-Driven Test Automation Frameworks for the Modern Software Quality Engineering. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 4(4), 257-269.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-17

How to Cite

AI-Based Automated Defect Detection and Test Prioritization in Software Quality Engineering. (2026). International Bulletin of Applied Science and Technology, 6(08), 79-87. https://researchcitations.com/index.php/ibast/article/view/7609

Similar Articles

1-10 of 551

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.