AI-Based Automated Defect Detection and Test Prioritization in Software Quality Engineering
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Automated Defect Detection, Test Prioritization, Software Quality EngineeringAbstract
The increasing complexity of software systems has created a need for quality engineering approaches that can identify defects efficiently and allocate testing resources according to risk. AI-based automation offers a mechanism for transforming conventional test execution from a largely rule-driven process into an adaptive decision-making activity. This paper develops a conceptual framework for AI-based automated defect detection and test prioritization by synthesizing principles from the provided literature on graphical authentication, password usability, user behavior, and security-oriented evaluation. Although the cited studies primarily address authentication rather than software testing, they collectively demonstrate the importance of usability, behavioral variability, attack resistance, user choice, and systematic evaluation in automated security-sensitive systems. These principles are mapped to defect detection and test prioritization through a proposed pipeline consisting of test-data acquisition, defect-feature extraction, risk scoring, intelligent classification, prioritization, execution, and feedback-based model refinement. The analysis argues that AI-driven test automation can improve the allocation of testing effort by prioritizing cases associated with higher predicted defect probability or security impact. The framework also incorporates the broader perspective of AI-driven test automation frameworks for modern software quality engineering (Ramamurthy, 2023). The paper concludes that AI-based prioritization should not replace conventional testing controls; rather, it should function as an adaptive decision-support layer whose effectiveness depends on representative data, explainability, continuous validation, and careful management of false-positive and false-negative outcomes.
Downloads
References
1. Assal, H., Imran, A., & Chiasson, S. (2018). An exploration ofgraphical password authentication for children.InternationalJournal of Child-Computer Interaction,18,37–46.
2. Azad, S., Rahman, M., Ranak, M. N., Ruhee, B. K., Nisa, N. N.,Kabir, N.,:::, & Zain, J. M. (2017). VAP code: A securegraphical password for smart devices. Computers &Electrical Engineering, 59, 99–109.
3. Biddle, R., Chiasson, S., & Van Oorschot, P. (2012). Graphicalpasswords: Learning from the first twelve years.Journal ofACM Computing Surveys (CSUR),44,19–41.
4. Brosto, S., & Sasse, M. A. (2000). Are Passfaces more usable thanpasswords? InA field trial investigation people and computersXIV–Usability or else!(pp. 405–424). Springer.
5. Danish, A., Sharma, L., Varshney, H., & Khan, A. M. (2016, March).Alignment-based graphical password authentication system. In2016 3rd International conference on computing for sustainableglobal development (INDIACom)(pp. 2950–2954). IEEE.
6. Davis, D., Monrose, F., & Reiter, M. (2004).On user choice ingraphical password schemes. InProceedings of the 13thUSENIX security symposium(pp. 151–164).
7. De-Angeli, A., Coventry, L., Johnson, G., & Renaud, K. (2005). Is apicture really worth a thousand words? Exploring thefeasibility of graphical authentication systems.InternationalJournal of Human-Computer Studies,63, 128–152.
8. Elftmann, P. (2006). Secure alternatives to password-basedauthentication mechanisms (Diploma Thesis, RWTH AachenUniversity, Aachen, Germany),https://www1.cs.fau.de/lepool/thesis/diplomarbeit-2006-elftmann.pdf. Accessed 20April 2017.
9. Gao, H., Ren, Z., Chang, X., Liu, X., & Aickelin, U. (2010). A newgraphical password scheme resistant to shoulder-surfing. InInternational conference on Cyberworlds (CW)(p. 194).
10. Gao, H. C., Wei, J., Ye, F., & Ma, L. C. (2013). A survey on the useof graphical passwords in security. Journal of Software, 8,1678–1698.http://www.jsoftware.us/vol8/jsw0807-16.pdf
11. Gayathiri, C. (2012). Text password survey: Transition fromfirst generation to second generation.http://blogs.ubc.ca/computersecurity/les/2012/04/Text-Password-SurveyGAYA.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2022.
12. Philip, P. G. (2025). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for Project Governance: Improving Transparency and Stakeholder Trust in Automated Project Decision. Journal of Project Management Studies, 2(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.58425/jpms.v2i1.570
13. Ramamurthy, K. (2023). AI-Driven Test Automation Frameworks for the Modern Software Quality Engineering. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 4(4), 257-269.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Azizbek Karimov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0). Under this license:
- Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercially
Attribution required: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Authors retain copyright of their work while granting the journal first publication rights.