ISSUES OF ENSURING THE INTIMATENESS OF PRIVATE LIFE, PRIVATE PROPERTY AND HOME AT THE COURT TRIAL STAGE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Authors

  • Hasanov Abdulmannon Mamatmurodovich Law Enforcement Academy Independent Researcher

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/

Keywords:

examination of evidence at trial, guarantees of inviolability of home, private property and private life, the Criminal Procedure Code, procedure for obtaining permission to enter a building, procedural obligations, comparative jurisprudence, judicial supervision, and its role in ensuring the right to a fair trial.

Abstract

In criminal proceedings, the balance between the right to privacy, private property and the security of the home during the trial stage often comes into conflict with the examination of evidence, the transparency of court proceedings and the procedural rights of the parties. The aim of this study is to determine the procedural mechanisms through which these three inviolable rights are restricted or protected during court proceedings in order to ensure an individual’s right to a fair trial, as well as to identify gaps in the existing procedure. A comparative analysis has shown that the level of protection in this area increases when procedural safeguards are concentrated in a separate article or chapter. It has been concluded that, in order to ensure immunities at the trial stage, it is necessary to define authorisation, judicial review and procedural.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I. Laws and by-laws

1. Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. — Tashkent: Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2023. — 48 p.

2. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. — Tashkent: Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 1995. — 320 p.

3. Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On ensuring legality in judicial proceedings in criminal cases." — Tashkent: Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2021. — 16 p.

Ii. National and foreign scientific literature and articles

4. D. A. Rakhmonova . Procedural guarantees of ensuring privacy in court proceedings // Jurisprudence. — 2023. — No. 4. — P. 45-52.

5. ABTojiboyev. Judicial control of the inviolability of housing and searches in criminal proceedings // Bulletin of Legal Sciences. — 2022. — No. 3. — P. 61-68.

6. FKNishonov. The principle of verification of evidence and non-interference in private life in court proceedings // Jurisprudence. — 2024. — No. 1. — P. 27-34 .

7. SSAbduazimov. Privacy and information security in the consideration of criminal cases // Jurisprudence. — 2022. — No. 3. — P. 19-26 .

8. Sh.R.Babayev. The role of judicial proceedings in ensuring the inviolability of private property // Law and Duty. — 2021. — No. 2. — P. 33-39 .

9. JJAllambayev. Procedural guarantees for the protection of private property in court proceedings // Philosophy and Law. — 2023. — No. 2. — P. 88-95 .

10. M.H. Rustamboyev. Criminal procedure: textbook. — Tashkent: Publishing house of the Tashkent State University of Economics, 2022. — 624 p.

11. BMG'ulomov. Issues of granting permission to enter a dwelling in criminal proceedings // Bulletin of Legal Sciences. — 2021. — No. 4. — P. 54-60 .

12. AAKhamdamov. "Sudebnoe razbiratelstvo i neprikosnovennost jilishcha v ugolovnom protesse" // Jurnal rossiyskogo prava. — 2021. — No. 7. — S. 112-121 .

13. Packer HL The Limits of Criminal Sanctions and the Protection of Home Privacy // Harvard Law Review. — 2021. — Vol. 134. — No. 8. — P. 1675-1692. DOI: 10.2307/1341234

14. Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Personal Data". — Tashkent: Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2019. — 24 p.

15. Roberts JV, Zuckerman AAS Criminal Evidence and the Protection of Privacy in Trial Proceedings // Criminal Law Review. — 2022. — Vol. 2022. — No. 6. — P. 451-468. DOI: 10.1177/00111287221000000

16. Bastrykin A.I., Kapinus O.S. Judicial zashchita prava sobstvennosti v ugolovnom procesese // Zakonnost. — 2021. — No. 11. — S. 3-10.

17. Lebedev V.M., Golovko L.V. Judicial control for limited constitutional law and ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2022. — No. 5. — S. 45-56.

18. Smirnov A.V., Kalinovsky K.B. Neprikosnovennost chastnoy jizni v stadii sudebnogo razbiratelstva po ugolovnomu delu // Rossiyskiy sudya. — 2023. — No. 9. — S. 12-18.

III. Electronic sources:

1.http://www.lex.uz

2.https://www.norma.uz

3.https://www.yurida.uz

4.https://www.akorda.kz/ru/

5.h ttp: //www.pravo.ru

Downloads

Published

2026-08-17

How to Cite

ISSUES OF ENSURING THE INTIMATENESS OF PRIVATE LIFE, PRIVATE PROPERTY AND HOME AT THE COURT TRIAL STAGE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. (2026). International Bulletin of Applied Science and Technology, 6(8), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.37547/

Similar Articles

101-110 of 859

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.