MORPHOMETRIC INDICATORS OF THE PROSTATE GLAND AND THEIR DIAGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE

Authors

  • Qarshiyev Jamshidbek Elbek og'li Student of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Termiz University of Economics and Service
  • Bekmirzayev Eshquvvat Ro‘ziboyevich Termez University of Economics and Service, Faculty of Medicine, Instructor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/

Keywords:

Prostate gland, morphometric indicators, prostate volume, prostate dimensions, transrectal ultrasound, multiparametric MRI, prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, prostate biopsy, histomorphometry, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostate cancer diagnostics

Abstract

This article analyzes morphometric indicators of the prostate gland and explains their diagnostic significance in benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and prostate cancer.Imaging methods such as transrectal ultrasonography and multiparametric MRI are discussed together with digital rectal examination, laboratory testing, and histopathologic confirmation. The article also highlights measurement standardization, common sources of error, and the value of integrating quantitative morphometry with symptoms and risk stratification. Overall, accurate morphometric assessment improves diagnostic confidence, supports selection of treatment pathways, and strengthens communication among clinicians, radiologists, and pathologists.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Rizaev J.A., Rakhimov N.M., Kadirov Kh.Kh., Shakhanova Sh.Sh. Disparity in the prevalence of prostate cancer in urban and rural settings (on the example of Samarkand region). Doctor’s Bulletin, 2022, No. 3(106), pp. 102–106.

2.Takhirovich T.I. Modern diagnostics of prostate cancer. Modern Education / Collection of Scientific Articles in Medicine (electronic scientific source), 2025.

3.Kadirov Kh.Kh., Rakhimov N.M. The importance of PSA and clinical indicators in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Proceedings of Samarkand State Medical University, 2021, pp. 45–52.

4.Rizaev J.A., Shakhanova Sh.Sh. Organizational and clinical aspects of early detection of prostate diseases in men. A New Day in Medicine, 2021, No. 4, pp. 118–124.

5.Kadirov Kh.Kh. Modern diagnostic methods in urology and andrology. Tashkent: Medical Publishing House, 2020. 216 p.

6.Rakhimov N.M. Correlation between ultrasound diagnostics and morphological examinations in prostate diseases. Journal of Uzbekistan Medicine, 2020, No. 6, pp. 67–73.

7.Shakhanova Sh.Sh., Rizaev J.A. Risk factors and screening approaches for prostate cancer. Problems of Biology and Medicine, 2023, No. 2, pp. 89–95.

8.Kadirov Kh.Kh., Rakhimov N.M., Rizaev J.A. Clinical, laboratory, and instrumental diagnostic algorithms in prostate pathologies. Samarkand: SamSMU Scientific-Methodological Publication, 2022. 134 p.orthogonal measurements and the ellipsoid formula.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

MORPHOMETRIC INDICATORS OF THE PROSTATE GLAND AND THEIR DIAGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE. (2026). International Bulletin of Medical Sciences and Clinical Research, 6(2), 219-225. https://doi.org/10.37547/

Similar Articles

21-30 of 145

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.