SURGICAL APPROACHES IN MULTILEVEL CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT AND CERVICAL HYBRID SURGERY: A SERIES OF FOUR CASE REPORTS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Multilevel artificial cervical disc replacement and anterior hybrid surgery have been established as effective treatments for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease. Proper surgical techniques are essential to alleviate patient symptoms and ensure the optimal functioning of cervical implants. However, the use of incorrect surgical strategies may result in complications such as implant migration and neurological deficits. In this paper, we outline our surgical strategies for multilevel cervical disc replacement and hybrid surgery, summarized into five key points.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
van Eck CF, Regan C, Donaldson WF, Kang JD, Lee JY. The revision rate and occurrence of adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a study of 672 consecutive patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:2143–2147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Carrier CS, Bono CM, Lebl DR. Evidence-based analysis of adjacent segment degeneration and disease after ACDF: a systematic review. Spine J. 2013;13:1370–1378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, Goldstein J, Zigler J, Tay B, Darden B. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J. 2009;9:275–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Anderson PA, Nassr A, Currier BL, Sebastian AS, Arnold PM, Fehlings MG, Mroz TE, Riew KD. Evaluation of Adverse Events in Total Disc Replacement: A Meta-Analysis of FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data. Global Spine J. 2017;7:76S–83S. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, Delamarter RB, Darden BV 2nd, Kopjar B. ProDisc-C Total Disc Replacement Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Single-Level Symptomatic Cervical Disc Disease: Seven-Year Follow-up of the Prospective Randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:1738–1747. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lavelle WF, Riew KD, Levi AD, Florman JE. Ten-year Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement with the BRYAN Cervical Disc: Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019;44:601–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Dryer RF, McConnell JR, Hodges SD, Schranck FW. Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: 10-year outcomes of a prospective, randomized investigational device exemption clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019:1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gornet MF, Burkus JK, Shaffrey ME, Schranck FW, Copay AG. Cervical disc arthroplasty: 10-year outcomes of the Prestige LP cervical disc at a single level. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;31:317–325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Laxer EB, Brigham CD, Darden BV, Bradley Segebarth P, Alden Milam R, Rhyne AL, Odum SM, Spector LR. Adjacent segment degeneration following ProDisc-C total disc replacement (TDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): does surgeon bias effect radiographic interpretation? Eur Spine J. 2017;26:1199–1204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Park DK, Lin EL, Phillips FM. Index and adjacent level kinematics after cervical disc replacement and anterior fusion: in vivo quantitative radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:721–730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Phillips FM, Lee JY, Geisler FH, Cappuccino A, Chaput CD, DeVine JG, Reah C, Gilder KM, Howell KM, McAfee PC. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E907–E918. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gornet MF, Lanman TH, Burkus JK, Hodges SD, McConnell JR, Dryer RF, Copay AG, Nian H, Harrell FE., Jr Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;26:653–667. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wu TK, Wang BY, Cheng D, Rong X, Lou JG, Hong Y, Liu H. Clinical and radiographic features of hybrid surgery for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease: A minimum 24-month follow-up. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;40:102–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Wu TK, Wang BY, Deng MD, Hong Y, Rong X, Chen H, Meng Y, Liu H. A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion combined with cervical disc arthroplasty and cervical disc arthroplasty for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e8112. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Meng Y, Wang X, Zhao Z, Wang B, Wu T, Liu H. Intraoperative Anterior Migration of the Prestige-LP Cervical Disc Owing to an Inappropriate Implantation Sequence During Continuous 2-Level Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement: A Case Report with 8-Year Follow-Up. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:194–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]