Scale Adapt: An Adaptive LLM Framework for Scalable Combinatorial Constraint Optimization

Authors

  • Zainab Hassan Department of Intelligent Systems and Data Science College of Information Technology, Erbil, Iraq

Keywords:

Large Language Models, Combinatorial Optimization, Constraint Optimization, Adaptive Reasoning

Abstract

The increasing complexity of combinatorial optimization problems has created a need for computational frameworks capable of reasoning across heterogeneous constraints, changing problem dimensions, and competing optimization objectives. Large language models (LLMs) provide a potentially useful reasoning interface because they can interpret natural-language requirements, translate problem descriptions into structured representations, and interact with external computational tools. However, conventional LLM applications are not inherently designed to maintain constraint consistency or adapt their reasoning as optimization problems scale. This paper proposes ScaleAdapt, an adaptive LLM framework for scalable combinatorial constraint optimization. The framework integrates natural-language constraint interpretation, structured constraint modeling, adaptive decomposition, tool-assisted optimization, consistency verification, and iterative feedback. Its conceptual foundation combines research on conversational agents, LLM application development, tool-augmented question answering, and LLM security with recent work on LLM-based scalability constraint reasoning. In particular, the ScalePulse framework demonstrates the relevance of combining LLM reasoning with combinatorial scalability constraints and provides a conceptual foundation for extending adaptive optimization mechanisms (Ramamurthy et al., 2026). ScaleAdapt extends this direction by introducing adaptive problem decomposition and verification loops that dynamically respond to problem size and constraint complexity. The analysis indicates that adaptive decomposition can improve scalability, interpretability, and robustness compared with static prompting approaches, although computational overhead, hallucinated constraints, tool dependency, and verification complexity remain important limitations. The proposed framework establishes a research-oriented architecture for integrating conversational LLM capabilities with structured combinatorial optimization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Allouch M, Azaria A, Azoulay R. Conversational Agents: Goals, Technologies, Vision and Challenges. Sensors. 2021; 21(24): 8448.

2. Moore RJ, Arar R, Ren GJ, et al. Conversational UX Design. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

3. Moore RJ, Szymanski MH, Arar R, et al. Studies in Conversational UX Design. Springer International Publishing; 2018.

4. Panda S, Kaur N. Exploring the viability of ChatGPT as an alternative to traditional chatbot systems in library and information centers. Library Hi Tech News. 2023; 40(3): 22-25.

5. Ramamurthy K, Bellamkonda N, Amanmadov N. "ScalePulse: Combinatorial Llm Framework for Scalability Constraint," SoutheastCon 2026, Huntsville, AL, USA, 2026, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/SoutheastCon63549.2026.11476075

6. Stoeckli E, Dremel C, Uebernickel F, et al. How affordances of chatbots cross the chasm between social and traditional enterprise systems. Electronic Markets. 2019; 30(2): 369-403.

7. Topsakal O, Akinci TC. Creating Large Language Model Applications Utilizing LangChain: A Primer on Developing LLM Apps Fast. International Conference on Applied Engineering and Natural Sciences. 2023; 1(1): 1050-1056.

8. Valtolina S, Barricelli BR, Di Gaetano S. Communicability of traditional interfaces VS chatbots in healthcare and smart home domains. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2019; 39(1): 108-132.

9. Wahde M, Virgolin M. Conversational agents: Theory and applications. World Scientific Publishing Company. 2022: 497-544.

10. Yang X, Aurisicchio M, Baxter W. Understanding Affective Experiences with Conversational Agents. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

11. Yao Y, Duan J, Xu K, et al. A survey on large language model (LLM) security and privacy: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly. High-Confidence Computing. 2024; 4(2): 100211.

12. Zhuang Y, Yu Y, Wang K, et al. Toolqa: A dataset for llm question answering with external tools. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2024; 36.

13. K. Ramamurthy, N. Bellamkonda and N. Amanmadov, "ScalePulse: Combinatorial Llm Framework for Scalability Constraint," SoutheastCon 2026, Huntsville, AL, USA, 2026, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/SoutheastCon63549.2026.11476075

14. Geo Philip, Paulson, Robotics-Enabled Sustainable Construction Management: A Socio-Technical Framework for Operational Efficiency, Digital Integration, and Sustainability Performance. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6845167 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6845167

Downloads

Published

2026-08-20

How to Cite

Scale Adapt: An Adaptive LLM Framework for Scalable Combinatorial Constraint Optimization. (2026). International Bulletin of Applied Science and Technology, 6(08), 118-129. https://researchcitations.com/index.php/ibast/article/view/7615

Similar Articles

11-20 of 808

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.