
THE DEVELOPMENT OF TEXTILE AND COTTON INDUSTRIES BASED ON THE INTRODUCTION OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS
Khamidova Dilora ,Abstract
This scientific article explores the evolutionary trajectory of the textile and cotton industries, scrutinizing the pivotal role played by innovative technologies in their development. Focusing on the intersection of technological advancements and environmental challenges, the study investigates the impacts of cutting-edge practices in cotton cultivation and textile manufacturing. The analysis encompasses both positive outcomes, such as increased efficiency and reduced resource consumption, and negative consequences, including environmental pollution and electronic waste. By examining current practices, challenges, and future prospects, this article aims to contribute valuable insights to the sustainable evolution of the textile and cotton industries.
Keywords
Textile industry, Cotton cultivation, Innovative technologies, Environmental impact, Sustainable practices, Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), Automation, Nanotechnology, 3D printing, Circular economy, Environmental regulations.
References
Binswanger, H. P., Rosenzweig, M. R. (1986). Behavioural and Material Determinants of Production Relations in Agriculture. Journal of Development Studies, 22(3), 503–539.
Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J. and Lee, J. W. (1998). How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115-135.
Burkitbayeva, S., Qiam, M., Swinnen, J. (2016). A black (white) hole in the global spread of GM cotton. Trends in Biotechnology, 34 (4), 260-263
Djanibekov, N. (2016). Agricultural Restructuring, Water Scarcity and the Adaptation to Climate Change in Central Asia: A Five-Country Study (AGRIWANET). Presented at during the Kazakhstan research workshop, IAMO, Halle (Saale), February 10, 2016.
Djanibekov, N., van Assche, K., Bobojonov, I., Lamers, J. (2012). Farm Restructuring and Land Consolidation in Uzbekistan: New Farms with Old Barriers. Europe‐Asia Studies, 64, 1101– 1126.
Djanibekov, U., van Assche, K., Boezeman, D. and Djanibekov, N. (2013). Understanding contracts in evolving agro-economies: Fermers, dekhqans and networks in Khoresm, Uzbekistan. Journal of Rural Studies, 32, 137-147.
Dries, L. and Swinnen, J. (2004). Foreign direct investment, vertical integration, and local suppliers: evidence from the Polish dairy sector. World Development, 32(9), 1525–1544.
Glover, D. and Kusterer, K. (1990). Small Farmers, Big Business: Contract Farming and Rural
Development. London: Macmillan.
Gow, H. and Swinnen, J. (2001). Private enforcement capital and contract enforcement in
transition countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 686–690.
Key, N. and Runsten, D. (1999). Contract farming, smallholders, and rural development in Latin America: the organization of agroprocessing firms and the scale of outgrower production. World Development, 27(2), 381–401.
Lerman, Z. (2010). Agricultural recovery and individual land tenure: Evidence from Central Asia. Imre Ferto, Csaba Forgacs, Attila Jambor (Eds.): Changing landscape of European agriculture. Essays in honour of professor Csaba Csaki. Budapest: Agroinform, pp. 95–113.
Little, P. and Watts, M. (1994). Living Under Contract: Contract Farming and Agrarian Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Mensch, G. (1979). Stalemate in Technology: Innovations overcome the Depression. Cambridge, Masachusetts, pp. 87–90.
Morrissy, J. D. (1974). Agricultural Modernization through Production Contracting. New York: Praeger.
Pandey, P. (2013). Triple Helix for Communication of Innovations: Case Study of Bt Cotton in India. Asian Biotechnology & Development Review, 15(1), 21-42.
Petrick, M. and Djanibekov, N. (2015). Institutional change in land and labour relations of Central Asia’s irrigated agriculture (AGRICHANGE). Project description. IAMO.
Petrick, M. and Djanibekov, N. (2016). Obstacles to crop diversification and cotton harvest mechanisation: Farm survey evidence from two contrasting districts in Uzbekistan: IAMO Discussion Papers 153. Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe (IAMO).
Pomfret, R. (2008). Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, Ch 8. In Dostortions to Agricultural Incentives in Europe’s Transition Economies. K. Anderson and J. Swinnen (Eds.). World Bank, Washington, DC, pp. 297-338.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.