ENGLISH LEARNERS IN STEM SUBJECTS: TRANSFORMING CLASSROOMS, SCHOOLS, AND LIVES

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2023-10-07

Main Article Content

Atoboyeva Aziza Muhiddin qizi
National of Uzbekistan Foreign Philology Faculty 3rd year student

Abstract

English learners (ELs) create science, innovation, engineering, and science (STEM) information and dialect capability when they are locked in in important interaction within the classroom and take an interest within the sorts of exercises in which STEM specialists and experts frequently lock in. This chapter gives the committee’s agreement sees of the inseparable relationship between dialect and substance. It begins with the committee’s position on dialect within the STEM subjects and expresses the ways in which ELs can be managed openings within the STEM classroom to draw on dialect and other meaning-making assets whereas locks in in disciplinary substance. The committee at that point depicts the current see of the STEM subjects and concludes with a vision of STEM instruction for ELs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 10 (2023): International Bulletin of Applied Science and Technology

Section

Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

ENGLISH LEARNERS IN STEM SUBJECTS: TRANSFORMING CLASSROOMS, SCHOOLS, AND LIVES. (2023). International Bulletin of Applied Science and Technology, 3(10), 57-62. https://researchcitations.com/index.php/ibast/article/view/2741

References

Alozie, N.M., Moje, E.B., and Krajcik, J.S. (2010). An analysis of the supports and constraints for scientific discussion in high school project-based science. Science Education, 94(3), 395–427.

Asunda, P. (2012). Standards for technological literacy and STEM education delivery through career and technical education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 23(2), 44–60.

Bailey, A.L., Butler, F.A., Stevens, R., and Lord, C. (2007). Further specifying the language demands of school. In A.L. Bailey (Ed.), The Language Demands of School: Putting Academic English to the Test (pp. 103–156). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Bailey, A.L., and Heritage, M. (2017). Imperatives for teacher education: Findings from studies of effective teaching for English language learners. In M. Peters, B. Cowie, and I. Menter (Eds.), A Companion to Research in Teacher Education. (pp. 697–712). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Barton, A.C., and Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 50–73.

Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M., Croft, W., Ellis, N.C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., and Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59(1), 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x.

Berland, L.K., and Reiser, B.J. (2011). Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191–216.

Berland, L.K., Schwarz, C.V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A.S., and Reiser, B.J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112.

Bezemer, J., and Kress, G. (2008). Writing in multimodal texts: A social semiotic account of designs for learning. Written Communication, 25(2), 166–195.

Bianchini, J.A. (1999). From here to equity: The influence of status on student access to and understanding of science. Science Education, 83(5), 577–601.

Blackwell, L.S., Trzesniewski, K.H., and Dweck, C.S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263.

Bricker, L.A., and Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92(3), 473–493.

Bunch, G.C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 298–341.

Bunch, G.C., Walqui, A., and Pearson, P.D. (2014). Complex text and new common standards in the United States: Pedagogical implications for English learners. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 533–559.

Carpenter, T.P., Fennema, E., Franke, M.L., Levi, L., and Empson, S.B. (1999). Children’s Mathematics: Cognitively Guided Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Carr, R.L., Bennett, L.D., and Strobel, J. (2012). Engineering in the K–12 STEM standards of the 50 U.S. states: An analysis of presence and extent. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 539–564.

Chinn, C.A., Buckland, L.A., and Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167.