COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL AND AESTHETIC EFFECTIVENESS OF IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED DENTAL IMPLANTATION IN AN AESTHETICALLY SIGNIFICANT ZONE

Authors

  • Мархабо Маматкулова Хушвахтовна Ассистент кафедры фармации и стоматологии Университета Альфраганус

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24185271

Keywords:

dental implantation, immediate implantation, delayed implantation, esthetic zone, osseointegration, peri-implant tissues, gingival recession, Pink Esthetic Score

Abstract

Relevance. Dental implantation in the esthetically demanding zone represents a complex clinical challenge, as treatment success is determined not only by implant osseointegration, but also by the preservation of bone volume, stability of the gingival contour, and esthetics of the final prosthetic restoration. Of particular interest is the comparison between immediate and delayed implantation, which differ in the timing of implant placement following tooth extraction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Riachi E., Juodzbalys G., Maciuliene D. Clinical Outcomes of Immediate, Early, and Delayed Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2024;39(5):157–173. doi:10.11607/jomi.10731.

Ickroth A., Seyssens L., Christiaens V., Pitman J., Cosyn J. Immediate versus early implant placement for single tooth replacement in the aesthetic area: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2024;35(6):585–597. doi:10.1111/clr.14261.

Chen R., Xu J., Wang S. et al. Effectiveness of immediate implant placement into defective sockets in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2025;133(2):411–426. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.022.

Garcia-Sanchez R., Dopico J., Kalemaj Z. et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of immediate versus delayed placement of dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2022;33(3):231–277. doi:10.1111/clr.13892.

Morton D., Gallucci G., Lin W.S. et al. Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Implant placement and loading protocols. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2023. doi:10.1111/clr.14137.

Oral Implants Research. 2023. doi:10.1111/clr.14137. [6] Chen S.T., Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla—a systematic review. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):186–215. doi:10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g3.3.

Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71.

Sterne J.A.C., Savović J., Page M.J. et al. RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Маматкулова Хушвахтовна, М. (2026). COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL AND AESTHETIC EFFECTIVENESS OF IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED DENTAL IMPLANTATION IN AN AESTHETICALLY SIGNIFICANT ZONE. International Bulletin of Medical Sciences and Clinical Research, 6(11), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24185271