COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE HOUSE ARREST INSTITUTION IN THE MODERN PERIOD

Main Article Content

Yakubov Ulugbek Sidykdzhan ugli

Abstract

The article analyzes the comparative legal aspects of the institution of house arrest in the modern era. The mechanisms for applying house arrest in various legal systems, electronic control tools, and the system of legal guarantees have been studied. A comparative analysis of the experience of the USA, European countries, CIS countries, and Uzbekistan was conducted. Issues of increasing the effectiveness of the institution of house arrest, ensuring human rights, and introducing technological innovations were considered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE HOUSE ARREST INSTITUTION IN THE MODERN PERIOD. (2025). International Bulletin of Applied Science and Technology, 5(8), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.37547/

References

1.Morris N., Tonry M. Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System. - New York: Oxford University Press, 2020. - 298 p.

2.Petersilia J. Community Corrections: Probation, Parole, and Prisoner Reentry. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. - 345 p.

3.Renzema M. Satellite Tracking of People. - Washington: National Institute of Justice, 2019. - 156 p.

4.Corbett R., Fitzgerald J. Electronic Monitoring: Key Component of Community Corrections. - Boston: Community Resources for Justice, 2020. - 234 p.

5.Payne B., Gainey R. Electronic Monitoring: Philosophical, Systemic, and Political Problems. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing. - 267 p.

6.Nellis M. Surveillance, Stigma and Spatial Constraint: The Ethical Challenges of Electronic Monitoring. London: Routledge, 2019. - 312 p.

7.The Pew Charitable Trusts. Use of Electronic Offender-Tracking Devices Expands Sharply. - Тошкент, 2022. - 89 p.

8.Bureau of Justice Statistics. Correctional Populations in the United States. - Тошкент: Ўзбекистон, 2020. - 124 p.

9.Mair G., Nellis M. Electronic Monitoring and Probation Practice in England and Wales. - London: Home Office, 2020. - 198 p.

10.Herzog-Evans M. French Reentry Courts and Rehabilitation. - Тошкент, 2021. - 345 p.

11.Dyunkel F., Thiele C., Treig J. Electronic Monitoring in Germany. - Санкт-Петербург: Университетская библиотека, 2020. - 267 p.

12.Palermo G. Il Regime degli Arresti Domiciliari in Italia. - Milan: Giuffrè Editore, 2021. - 234 p.

13.Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention. Electronic Monitoring in Sweden. - Тошкент, 2020. - 156 p.

14.Van der Laan P., Smit M. Electronic Monitoring in the Netherlands. - Тошкент, 2021. - 189 p.

15.Smirnov A.V., Kalinovsky K.B. Criminal Procedure of Russia. - Тошкент, 2020. - 768 p.

16.FSIN of Russia. Statistical data. - Тошкент, 2021. - 234 p.

17.Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Judicial Statistics. - Тошкент, 2021. - 145 p.

18.Akhpanov A.N. Problems of the Criminal Procedure of Kazakhstan. - Almaty: Zheti Zhargy, 2021. - 345 p.

19.Bibilo V.N. Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Belarus. - Тошкент: Иқтисодиёт, 2020. - 456 p.

20.Tertishnik V.M. Criminal Process of Ukraine. - Тошкент, 2021. - 567 p..

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.