COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE HOUSE ARREST INSTITUTION IN THE MODERN PERIOD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37547/Keywords:
house arrest, comparative analysis, electronic control, human rights, technological innovations.Abstract
The article analyzes the comparative legal aspects of the institution of house arrest in the modern era. The mechanisms for applying house arrest in various legal systems, electronic control tools, and the system of legal guarantees have been studied. A comparative analysis of the experience of the USA, European countries, CIS countries, and Uzbekistan was conducted. Issues of increasing the effectiveness of the institution of house arrest, ensuring human rights, and introducing technological innovations were considered.
Downloads
References
1.Morris N., Tonry M. Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System. - New York: Oxford University Press, 2020. - 298 p.
2.Petersilia J. Community Corrections: Probation, Parole, and Prisoner Reentry. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. - 345 p.
3.Renzema M. Satellite Tracking of People. - Washington: National Institute of Justice, 2019. - 156 p.
4.Corbett R., Fitzgerald J. Electronic Monitoring: Key Component of Community Corrections. - Boston: Community Resources for Justice, 2020. - 234 p.
5.Payne B., Gainey R. Electronic Monitoring: Philosophical, Systemic, and Political Problems. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing. - 267 p.
6.Nellis M. Surveillance, Stigma and Spatial Constraint: The Ethical Challenges of Electronic Monitoring. London: Routledge, 2019. - 312 p.
7.The Pew Charitable Trusts. Use of Electronic Offender-Tracking Devices Expands Sharply. - Тошкент, 2022. - 89 p.
8.Bureau of Justice Statistics. Correctional Populations in the United States. - Тошкент: Ўзбекистон, 2020. - 124 p.
9.Mair G., Nellis M. Electronic Monitoring and Probation Practice in England and Wales. - London: Home Office, 2020. - 198 p.
10.Herzog-Evans M. French Reentry Courts and Rehabilitation. - Тошкент, 2021. - 345 p.
11.Dyunkel F., Thiele C., Treig J. Electronic Monitoring in Germany. - Санкт-Петербург: Университетская библиотека, 2020. - 267 p.
12.Palermo G. Il Regime degli Arresti Domiciliari in Italia. - Milan: Giuffrè Editore, 2021. - 234 p.
13.Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention. Electronic Monitoring in Sweden. - Тошкент, 2020. - 156 p.
14.Van der Laan P., Smit M. Electronic Monitoring in the Netherlands. - Тошкент, 2021. - 189 p.
15.Smirnov A.V., Kalinovsky K.B. Criminal Procedure of Russia. - Тошкент, 2020. - 768 p.
16.FSIN of Russia. Statistical data. - Тошкент, 2021. - 234 p.
17.Judicial Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Judicial Statistics. - Тошкент, 2021. - 145 p.
18.Akhpanov A.N. Problems of the Criminal Procedure of Kazakhstan. - Almaty: Zheti Zhargy, 2021. - 345 p.
19.Bibilo V.N. Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Belarus. - Тошкент: Иқтисодиёт, 2020. - 456 p.
20.Tertishnik V.M. Criminal Process of Ukraine. - Тошкент, 2021. - 567 p..
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0). Under this license:
- Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercially
Attribution required: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Authors retain copyright of their work while granting the journal first publication rights.
